7/30/2023 0 Comments KODAK Picture Kiosk Plus SoftwareShots with large expanses of blue sky, which is filled with subtle tonal differences, showed marked differences between kiosks. In some cases, the differences between prints were obvious. Camera House's Fuji kiosk, in particular, seemed to drag on and on by asking too many questions. Overall, the Kodak software was by far the most intuitive, although the Agfa kiosk deserves commendation for its capable, if less polished, interface. Some kiosks, for example, allowed us to select glossy or matte prints, while others skipped this option and left it up to the operator. The kiosk software can clearly be heavily customised by shop owners, since all three Fuji displays offered a different sequence of options, not all of which added value to the experience and many of which made the process of selecting and editing the pictures less than intuitive. The Kodak and Agfa kiosks loaded thumbnails quickly and only copied over the images it needed to print after they were selected and edited - making the whole process far quicker by comparison, the Fuji kiosks wanted to copy all of the 150-plus images from the SD card to their hard drives before allowing our 11 test images to be selected and edited. Screen quality was bright and clear, making it easy to select pictures to print from a preview. In our experiments, the Kodak kiosks had by far the best user interface.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |